User talk:Steven C. Price

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Steven C. Price!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Colin and Julie's Trip from Scotland to Syria.jpg

File:Colin and Julie's Trip from Scotland to Syria.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

-- Ies (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Julie in tree.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Julie in tree.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Colin rowing across the Atlantic Ocean.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Colin rowing across the Atlantic Ocean.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 08:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Julie in an Olive Tree.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Julie in an Olive Tree.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 08:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Door-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed-V.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed-V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laundry-Lady-in-Mai-Chau,-Vietnam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Great composition. --Yann 20:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulls-Gap-Water-Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is OK but could you add some water tower-related category, please? --Basotxerri 15:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Comment I added a new water category. Done @Basotxerri: --Steven C. Price 13:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Thank you. OK for me. --Basotxerri 14:38, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ha-Long-Bay3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support - Very good, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 23:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ha-Long-Bay5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globe-Gila-County-Courthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals are good enough for Q1, but image might have ben a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 20:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medinet-Temple-Column-Detail4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 09:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bat-Trang-Ceramic-Village1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall nice photograph; lower resolution than most, as it's from 2005, but that doesn't bother me. --WClarke 20:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taliesen-petroglyph2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some chromatic aberration that needs to be removed. Think you could do that? --W.carter 08:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC))I have done so.  Done.@W.carter: --Steven C. Price 19:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Just barely removed, there is traces still in the trees and top but sufficient for QI. --W.carter 20:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medhane-Alem-Cathedral1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Acceptable for sharpness, but you should correct the perspective. --A.Savin 11:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)I'm afraid I do no know how to efficiently change a picture. I made the perspective change, thought I replaced the original, but it is still here. So, I re-submitted it today. Sorry. ? @A.Savin: --Steven C. Price 14:51, 25 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment You should upload the new version of the same file, and not upload a different file. Go to file description page and click on "Upload new version of this file" --A.Savin 11:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC))  Done.--Steven C. Price 20:04, 26 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment At the left, it's still distortet --A.Savin 19:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC))  Done. I have hopefully corrected this. At point of diminishing returns, perhaps.--Steven C. Price 20:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC) OK now, I have merged your three separate versions into one file. --A.Savin 09:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bat-Trang-Ceramic-Village16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted to the right. And also a category about the vehicle/transport could be helpfull. --C messier 09:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC))  Done@C messier: . --Steven C. Price 20:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --C messier 10:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kecharis-Roof-Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little unsharp in the shadows on top, but good quality overall and a nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 21:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williams-Citizen-Bank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit tight to the borders but OK for me. --Basotxerri 14:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kom-Ombo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edfu-Column-detail2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:44, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff-dwellings-detail2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff-Dwellings,-Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff-Dewelling-Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaco-Ruins,-Detail2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medinet Habu Temple, Piles of Hands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Look ok but the line over the hieroglyphs should be horizontal. --W.carter 20:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)The line is original. The craftspeople did not always etch/carve in straight lines. But I can modify if you wish.--Steven C. Price 21:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC) I understand that the camera probably was horizontal and that the line was not. However, cameras and photos can be tilted to give a more harmonious view and unless there is a strong reason not to, it is usually done here. --W.carter 22:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Understood.  Done.--Steven C. Price 18:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 21:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Robert-Allard.jpg

File:Robert-Allard.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 08:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Oxford-Gargoyles1-.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oxford-Gargoyles1-.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 09:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff-Dwelling-Detail3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 19:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tent-Rocks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ahum... The description here at QIC is supposed to be short, not the entire file description. Please edit the text when you make a nomination. --W.carter 16:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC))  Done. --Steven C. Price 18:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yeghvard-Church,-Right-Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edfu-Relief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:58, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Leadville pictures

Hi, Steven. Thanks for uploading the Leadville pictures. What a beautiful historic town! I added a thumbnail of one of them to the Wikivoyage Leadville article. If you have any interest in fleshing out the information in that article, that could be really useful to prospective visitors.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Western-Hardware.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabor-Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laundry-Lady-in-Mai-Chau,-Vietnam.jpg

Hi, FYI ;o) Yann (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laundry-Lady-in-Mai-Chau,-Vietnam.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laundry-Lady-in-Mai-Chau,-Vietnam.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Congrats! Yann (talk) 21:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Steven C. Price

User:Steven C. Price has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/User:Steven C. Price This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

180.191.123.221 11:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Mapofroundworldtripcolin.png

File:Mapofroundworldtripcolin.png has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mapofroundworldtripcolin.png This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 01:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mausoleum of Mohammed V This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Columns-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg

And also:

• File:Door-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed-V.jpg
• File:Door-at-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
• File:Entrance-to-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed-V.jpg
• File:Fountain-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
• File:Guard-at-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed V.jpg
• File:Guard-at-the-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
• File:Roof-Detail-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg
• File:Tile-detail-at-Mausoleum-of-Mohammed.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)