Jump to content

User talk:Aciarium

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 11 hours ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion (11 August 2026)

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:DSC01644 Boats at the Port of Menton, 2024-12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DSC01644 Boats at the Port of Menton, 2024-12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (27 May 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC08927-2 Beach, Forest, and Sky at Plaża Białogóra, Poland, 2025-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:49, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG5969 Raffaello-Sernesi-Straße 3, Bozen, Trilingual Sign, 2017-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:50, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC08243 Memorial Bricks for the People of Łódź, 2025-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --E bailey 17:19, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC08246 Memorial Bricks for the Citicens of Łódź, 2025-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:50, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG5964 Raffaello-Sernesi-Straße 3, Bozen, Southeast View, 2017-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:50, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Set Promoted to FP

[edit]
This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Memorial Stones for the Citizens of Łódź, Poland, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Memorial Stones for the Citizens of Łódź, Poland, has been promoted. Thank you very much for your contribution! If you would like to nominate another image or set of images, please do so at this nomination page.

/Wilfredor (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mitsubishi iMiEV of the Carabinieri

[edit]

Rose Abrams (talk) 10:02, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (02 August 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ascension in its region.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:50, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Zur Randschärfe der Nachtaufnahme des Justizzentrums Leoben (DSC04351)

[edit]

Hallo Aciarium, in der FP-Diskussion zu Deiner schönen Nachtaufnahme des Justizzentrums Leoben (DSC04351) wurde ja angemerkt: „quality at the borders drops significantly“. Darf ich interessehalber fragen, mit was für einem Objektiv diese Aufnahme gemacht wurde? Die beste Einstellung zur Vermeidung eines Schärfeabfalls am Rand hängt von den Eigenschaften des Objektivs ab. Mit älteren Optiken kann es tatsächlich nötig sein, deutlich abzublenden (viele Fotografen verwenden immer noch traditionell ƒ/11 für alles, was nicht davonläuft ;–); bei sehr guten neueren Objektiven ist das dagegen oft unnötig und führt nur zu Schärfeverlusten infolge der ab ƒ/8 merkbaren, bei ƒ/11 schon deutlichen Diffraktion. Ausnahme sind Objektive mit starker Bildfeldwölbung, aber auch das ist bei neueren guten Objektiven selten geworden. – Ich schreibe das hier, um die FP-Diskussion nicht unnötig zu überfrachten. Und ich schreibe es nicht, weil ich „klugscheißen“ wollte, sondern weil ich in FP-Diskussionen manchmal etwas unausgegorene Ratschläge lese, die nicht berücksichtigen, welche Vor- und Nachteile große und kleine Blendenwerte haben und dass vieles vom gewählten Objektiv abhängt. Beste Grüße, – Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Aristeas: Hallo Aristeas, erstmal danke für dein hilfreiches Feedback! :) Ich habe mit einem Sony FE 24-105 mm 4.0 G OSS gearbeitet, das mich bzgl. Randunschärfe eigentlich bisher nie sonderlich enttäuscht hat, auch nicht bei "offeneren" Blenden wie f/6,3. Allerdings glaube ich nach neuerlicher Durchsicht der Einzelbilder, aus denen ich das Panorama zusammengesetzt habe, dass es eher an den widrigen Umständen vor Ort lag. Aus dem Endergebnis geht nicht wirklich hervor, wie breit und hoch die monumentale Fassade in Wirklichkeit ist; zudem wollte ich Schärfesprünge im Resultat vermeiden und habe mit manuellem Fokus gearbeitet (der auf den frontal betrachteten Haupteingang gerichtet war und während der Aufnahmen nicht verändert wurde). Dementsprechend ist bei f/6,3 und dem nicht gerade kleinen horizontalen Winkelbereich, der Bild für Bild "abgescannt" wird, der optimale Schärfebereich recht schnell verlassen.

Grund für die vergleichsweise offene Blende (ich hätte ja selber lieber mit f/8–9 fotografiert) waren übrigens ganz niedere menschliche Empfindlichkeiten: Ich war wegen der schlechten Lichtverhältnisse bei 30 Sekunden Belichtungsdauer und f/6.3 "schon" bei ISO 800 – abblenden und länger belichten wollte ich aufgrund des kalten Wetters dann auch nicht unbedingt. :D Das Thema Panoramafotografie ist für mich in der Form vergleichsweise neu, es hat also jeder Versuch einen ziemlichen Lerneffekt in sich (in diesem Fall ist es wohl "großes Gebäude und kleiner Blendenwert => schlecht"), und ich bin für jeden Rat dankbar! Du hast nicht zufälligerweise ein paar Tipps, wie man trotz Arbeit mit Stativ und manueller Überschneidungskorrektur in PTgui verbleibende Stitching Errors beseitigen kann? ;) Liebe Grüße, Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 18:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:DSC04351 Justizzentrum Leoben North Facade at Night, 2026-04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DSC04351 Justizzentrum Leoben North Facade at Night, 2026-04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Wilfredor (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (05 August 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tristan da Cunha in its region.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I believe the widespread location map scheme doesn't include this reddish inner circle that you drew : see File:Bouvet Island in its region.svg for an example of a map of another island too small to be visible --Benjism89 07:50, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Benjism89: Thank you, very attentive! I think I had adapted this from a Monaco locator map. Anyway, I will fix it! --Aciarium 01:12, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Benjism89: ✓ Done --Aciarium 12:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:38, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (07 August 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC08886 Colmarplatz 1, Eisenstadt, 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC04012 Koksgasometer bei Nacht, voestalpine Linz, 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC03968 Gasometer für Gicht- und Tiegelgas bei Nacht, voestalpine Linz, 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:08, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (11 August 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC06421 Wiese, Tollinggraben Sankt Peter-Freienstein, 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC06423 Unbefestigte Straße und Wald, Tollinggraben Sankt Peter-Freienstein, 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC06424 Unbefestigte Straße und Wald, Tollinggraben Sankt Peter-Freienstein, 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 03:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DSC06427 Straße durch Wald, Tollinggraben Sankt Peter-Freienstein, 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply