Jump to content

Commons:Photography critiques

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 2 months ago by PeterCooperJr in topic Cherry blossom photo
Shortcut
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days.

color palette logo Welcome to the Photography critiques!

Would you like a second opinion before nominating a photograph of yours as a Quality Image, Valued Image or Featured Picture candidate, can't decide which of your images to enter into one of the Photo Challenges? Or do you have specific questions about how to improve your photography or just would like some general feedback?

This is the right page to gather other people's opinions!


Update this page
Update this page



If you want general suggestions to a good photo, you can ask here, and we already wrote guidelines.

See image guidelines >>

If you don't get some terminology used here, don't be shy you can ask about it, or read

See photography terms >>

Please insert new entries at the bottom, and comment on oldest entries first.

To prevent archiving use {{subst:DNAU}}, because SpBot archives all sections after 90 days, unless archiving has been postponed or suppressed through the use of {{subst:DNAU}}. You can ask the bot to archive a section earlier by using {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} – then it will be archived after 7 days.



Archive


Cherry blossom photo

[edit]

I think this is my favorite photo of the year that I've taken so far.

I don't know as it's quite FP-worthy, but I would love suggestions on things I could have done better, especially with composition and editing. Thank you! — PeterCooperJr (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Certainly not a bad photo. Might have been improved by a higher f-stop; assuming there was any wind, though, you couldn't do a much longer exposure, so you'd have to increase the ISO number. I think you could have had some gain there: ISO 100 is very low, most digital cameras will perform roughly as well at ISO 200 and even ISO 400. Also, I'd have cropped this a bit at top and (especially) left, I think it would make for a more dynamic composition. - Jmabel ! talk 20:36, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Maybe I'm still not entirely comfortable with photography jargon, but are you saying that the image should be brighter? Or just saying that instead of f/8 ISO 100, it would have worked better at like f/11 ISO 200 which in theory would be at the same brightness? Would that be to make something look better with the flower, the clouds, or both? (Also, it's a relatively-low-end camera with smaller than a full-frame sensor, which I know isn't quite as good at higher f-stops and higher ISOs, though I'm guessing probably for this it would still be adequate.)
In terms of the crop, I liked the look of the expanse of clouds, but I can see how putting more focus on the flower might work better in some ways. I've made an attempt; is this the kind of thing you were thinking of?
Thank you for your feedback! — PeterCooperJr (talk) 22:15, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply