Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
133, 132, 131, 130, 129, 128, 127, 126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Gmyazbeckk

[edit]

Continued creation of AI-generated images.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:نسيم يوسف يزبك.png was created because the image was AI-generated; the UDR failed.

On 2 August, they uploaded another AI-generated image; I am trying to get it deleted. Does any admin want to block them on Commons, since they're already indeffed on Arabic Wikipedia? Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 29#Gmyazbeckk ended without action after they swore only a week ago to stop uploading personal works and be a constructive contributor. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Also this. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 04:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done: indeffed following report at ANU. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done. I declined unblock request. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Axnasia998465667797

[edit]

Repeatedly uploading movie posters (copyvio) and claiming them as their own work. ⚔Fabius History⚔ (Salve!) 08:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Last warning sent. Most files deleted. Yann (talk) 09:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I tagged File:Eternally Yours Title Card Orange.webp as a copyvio. I seriously doubt that the uploader holds the copyright.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jeff G.: how could that be above COM:TOO? - Jmabel ! talk 20:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel: The fang-like descenders don't look like typography.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:18, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jeff G.: similar things are really common among metal bands. We have a lot of much more extreme typography in Category:Logos of heavy metal music groups and its subcats. Examples: File:Angelus Apatrida.svg, File:Abrogation logo.svg, File:Hermética Logo.svg, File:Gorilla Monsoon Logo.svg. - Jmabel ! talk 18:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Even those are pretty tame compared to some - see the logos in this somewhat famous poster, for example. That being said, most of those band logos are probably above TOO.
In this case, the "Eternally Yours" logo may be out of scope for a completely different reason - while there is an upcoming TV series by that name, it does not appear to use that logo. Omphalographer (talk) 23:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I agree that "it does not appear to use that logo".   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:23, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Feel more than free to nominate as out of scope if there is no basis to think this is what it claims to be; I was commenting only on the copyrightability. - Jmabel ! talk 19:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Block request for Aura Models

[edit]

Aura Models (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Appears to be a promotional account. On their user page they state that "We create and upload media files, including portraits and promotional images of our models and talent". ForeverFlying (talk) 08:33, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not inherently against Commons rules, but the notability of the people whose images they are uploading is, to put it politely, questionable. Pinging @Aura Models, since this is as good a place as any to discuss this. - Jmabel ! talk 19:49, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Block request for Charly Man1

[edit]

Charly Man1 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

It's a block evasion of FlyDutch0 and also a global lock evasion. I'm a checkuser on the Russian Wikipedia. P.S.: I would also suggest to remove / hide their "contributions" on Commons, which revolve around the topic of naked children, as it was done with their previous account. -- Q-bit array (talk) 10:35, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have indeffed the user for block/lock evasion. Would leave the files for someone else as the images are not new but just copies of existing ones. Shaan SenguptaTalk 11:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have absolutely no problem wiping unused uploads by lock evading accounts. Gone per CSD G3. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:48, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:04, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Block request for Kenigtlym2

[edit]

Kenigtlym2 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

This user is a sockpuppet of Milan Szymon Szulc. I checked his old GlyphWiki page, with his user nickname being called “szulc220” (which is a modified version of Szulc), he says he’s the owner of KenigMoji, aka. Kenig (shortened version). Also, he combines his username with the suffix “-tlym2”. This user is also doing the same behavior as Milan Szymon Szulc and Szulc is also working the current user. I think he likes Kenig much. Hillsilo (talk) 02:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

This can be done whether or not Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Milan Szymon Szulc comes out positive.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jeff G. I’m waiting for the block to happen… Hillsilo (talk) 12:57, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Comment The CheckUser case was declined because Milan Szymon Szulc is stale. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ✓ Done Indef-blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 18:49, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Block and suppres username forLula_ladrão_reincidente_a_Polícia_Federal_vai_te_pegar

[edit]

Username is a political message with name-calling and a threat to the current President of Brazil: "Lula, you persistent thief, the Federal Police will catch you". Munter He (talk) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Support.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done indef-blocked as an inappropriate filename. However, I don't see this as so inappropriate as to require suppression of where it may have been used.
Upload File:Bandeira da Polícia Federal.png is licensed as {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} Since the author credit is not to this user (it just reads "Agente Pereira"), it wouldn't force someone to attribute this offensive name to reuse the file. That does raise an interesting potential issue for the future: what do we do if an otherwise valid license requires an offensive attribution? - Jmabel ! talk 01:01, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel: what about quotation marks on both sides of the username? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 15:45, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Or this?

Wikimedia user "Lula ladrão reincidente a Polícia Federal vai te pegar"

Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 15:45, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sure. But what if it was something even more offensive: e.g. a Nazi slogan, or something praising pedophilia? What if it was the URL of a gambling site, or the phone number of something where you are charged if you dial it? We probably ought to have a policy that requiring such an inappropriate attribution makes the file unacceptable. - Jmabel ! talk 18:21, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Block request for User:Nexusdude

[edit]

Nexusdude (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log I don't know how many times a user can upload the same copyrighted image over and over to Commons before someone actually takes notice and blocks them. -- Veggies (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Comment, can you elaborate on how this user "upload the same copyrighted image over and over to Commons"? From the logs, I only see the user uploaded the 2 files in 13 and 19 May 2026, and never made any edits since. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 06:21, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Tvpuppy: Are you unable to see his talk page where it shows the warnings he received when he previously uploaded the file as a PNG? The warning states that the file was previously uploaded and deleted even then. -- Veggies (talk) 07:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Both are mugshots of the same person, but the image is not the same. And @Veggies, Tvpuppy is 100% correct in what they said. Anyways, file deleted, user warned. No action at this time because account is stale for more than two months now. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Veggies: The talk page shows the warnings were made on 20 May and 21 May 2026, after the user uploaded both images, and the user has not made any edits since. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 09:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Block request for User:Juan Manuel Cruz Santiago

[edit]

Juan Manuel Cruz Santiago (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log An account solely for the purpose of vandalism Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Block request for User:Rafael caro Quintero one

[edit]

Rafael caro Quintero one (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log An account solely for the purpose of vandalism Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:36, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply